The Star Wars universe is one of endless possibility. You want a wild planet filled with witches who ride giant monsters?1 Sure! How about a cyberpunkish cityscape? Got that! Technocrats? Yep. Cocky smugglers? Oh yeah. Basically, the Extended Universe has gotten large and absurd enough that anything you can imagine is probably canonical at this point. It's hard to deny the appeal of Darth Vader, the Force, and lightsabers (just don't mention the midichlorians). However, the downside of all this is that you will die. Seriously. Do you have any idea how often in the Extended Universe there are "Rocks and/or aliens fall, the entire planet dies" scenarios? A billion deaths here, a trillion deaths there, pretty soon you're talking serious misfortune. Grand Moff Tarkin using the Death Star to obliterate Alderaan was freaking child's play compared to the Yuuzhan Vong. Odds are, you're not going to be a badass Jedi, you're going to be the poor sap murdered in a bar for looking at someone wrong and nobody will ever care, even when your body turns up in the local cafeteria's steam table. Let's also remember this is the universe where slavery is reasonably common, local squalor is really squalid, and organized crime gangs don't just run parts of Mexico, they run the whole freaking planet. It's like when the RenFaire nutballs generally forget that the laws of probability dictate that they're not going to be riding in on their mighty steed and saving the pretty princesses, but instead will be farming mud and plague and being nailed to a pole if they ever poke their heads up.
On the other hand, Star Trek's universe basically is a bunch of hyper-advanced species who all generally live decent lives. The starting premise of the humans is that everyone got together and has a benevolent technocratic government ruling peacefully and giving everyone a fantastic standard of living. Whee. I could deal with that. Hunger and illnesses are minimized or cured, there really doesn't appear to be nearly the seedy underbelly of society that exists in the galaxy far, far away, and even if you do end up dying horribly in one of the occasional devastating wars that wracks the universe, odds are that a series reboot or a time recursion or alternate universe handwave will make it all better. Sure, things might be marginally less exciting2 and you might have slightly fewer options to do whatever the hell you want and get away with it, but I think that's a fair trade for stability, safety, and living well. I'd rather be on a five-year mission in a top-of-the-line, science-and-kickassery-ready vessel that has all kinds of creature comforts than be stapled into an armor suit that doesn't stop handgun fire and then die horribly when the ship I'm stationed on gets blown up by a bunch of plucky rebel
To sum up, let's compare a few things here. Who wins?
- Badass starships.
- Utterly annoying aliens.
- That one character everyone wants to be when they grow up.
- Hugely detailed backstory.
- Would I ever want to live there?
- Absolutely Star Trek. Space socialism wins the day.
1 I am ashamed to admit I knew the name of this planet off the top of my head.↩
2 All I'm saying is that if this is significant enough to earn a page on your fanbase wiki (shut up, I know about the movie, that was just one thing and it has its own page, my point still stands), your universe might be a bit lacking in zest.↩
Interesting way to evaluate it. While I agree with your conclusion, my huge trekkie boner is compelling me to point out a few additional things on the Star Trek side.
ReplyDelete1. I'm not sure if the depth of a universe's background development is a fair measuring stick, if only because the Star Trek universe will always be premised on slightly more realistic (and therefore limited) terms. The Star Trek universe is quite definitively an imagining of our own reality, four centuries down the road. So it's limited by the fact that its backstory has to fit with history - we can't go back in time and look at the Old Federation from a thousand years ago because you'd be looking at the real-world 1400s.
The starting premise of Star Wars is "a long time ago, in a galaxy far away..." and yet the first thing we establish is the existence of biological humans. Since this is scientifically impossible (unless the expanded universe pulls some sort of cheap-ass "these people are our ancestors" stunt), all bets are off from the moment we step out the gate. Star Wars has no limits and no real-world starting point for continuity, which in my mind makes it stray away from sci-fi and more towards fantasy on occasion. And while that's not a bad thing in itself, it makes it harder evaluate a direct comparison.
2. Though admittedly less developed, the Star Trek universe does have a darker side (mostly expanded upon in DS9), even in the Federation. There is slavery (mostly prostitution, but still...), and there are shadowy branches within the Federation that basically violate all of its principles, but in doing so often end up making the space socialism concept viable. The Federation did defeat the Dominion in honest space combat, but a huge contributing factor was the fact that the Federation (or at least a branch of it) had deployed large-scale biological (and eventually genocidal) weapons against the Founders.
I guess all I'm trying to say is that Star Trek isn't entirely a universe of unimaginative hippies, and even when it is, it's not entirely Star Trek's fault.
Anthony: NEEEEEEEEEEEERD. That is all the rebuttal I really need, since sadly I cannot stuff you into a trashcan via the internet.
ReplyDelete